In the News - September 30, 2009

HR Compliance Law Bulletin:

In the spring, swine flu fears sparked sudden closures at more than 100 schools in at least eight states, sending parents scrambling for last-minute child care. Some parents stayed home, some found alternative care, and some brought their children with them to work.

Not everyone agreed with the latter choice. "This morning, one of our workers stated she had to work from home since her son's school was closed due to the swine flu, or she could just bring her son up to the office and work. Ummmm-please stay home," wrote one per-son on a national parenting Internet forum.

HR Compliance Law Bulletin (download PDF of article)

Middle ground is acceptable

Audrey Mross, a partner at Munck Carter PC in Dallas, Texas, says that not every policy has to include an outright ban. "If the environment, including coworkers, are amenable to the occasional child at work, have a policy that explains the limitations which the parent will be responsible for enforcing, such as no roaming, noise, food/drink, off limits areas, and so on," she says.

The important thing is to have and communicate a policy so that everyone in the workplace has the same expectation. "A policy puts everyone on fair notice," Mross says.

http://west.thomson.com/productdetail/138997/40560037/productdetail.aspx

©2009 West, a Thomson Reuters business.

While we would like to hear from you, please understand that merely contacting Munck Carter does not create an attorney-client relationship with us or impose any obligation on us. Please do not send us any confidential or sensitive information unless and until you have first talked to one of our attorneys and we have entered into a written engagement letter that establishes an attorney-client relationship with us. When you execute an engagement letter from Munck Carter, you will be our client, and then we may exchange information freely.

By clicking “OK” below, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You also agree that, even if the information you send us is highly confidential and is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, our review of your information does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.