top of logo August 28, 2008
Munck Carter - Trials. Transactions. Technology.
bottom of logo Contact UsResource Links
HomeFirm OverviewPractice AreasCareersAttorney ProfilesE-NewsletterNews and Resources
News and Resources

Intellectual Property News

[08/11] Poof! Scientists closer to invisibility cloak
[08/08] Scientists create stem cells for 10 disorders
[07/30] Italy's Mediaset suing YouTube over use of video
[08/27] Jury awards Mattel Inc. $100 million in Bratz suit
[08/25] PRO-Keds undergoes makeover

More...

Intellectual Property Articles

Pick a Winning Name for Your Business

There's a lot of room for personal and professional creativity when choosing a business name, but there are three main considerations to keep in mind:

More...

What are the exceptions to the rule that the creator of a work owns the copyright?

Copyrights are generally owned by the people who create the works of expression, with some important exceptions:

More...

Intellectual Property Case Summaries

[08/27] Gander Mountain Co. v. Cabela's, Inc.
In a case arising from a contract dispute involving a 1996 transaction between the parties, summary judgment for plaintiff on a counterclaim, finding that a provision at issue was unenforceable because it was merely an agreement to agree, is affirmed over claims that the district court violated the law-of-the-case doctrine and erred in granting summary judgment.

[08/25] Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
In a dispute over two patents for tobacco curing processes, judgment of unenforceability of both patents due to inequitable conduct and summary judgment of invalidity of all asserted claims due to indefiniteness are reversed and remanded where: 1) the evidence did not support findings of either deceptive intent or materiality with respect to the inequitable-conduct claims; and 2) a claim term construed by the district court clearly delineated the bounds of claim scope and was therefore not indefinite.

[08/21] Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. VUTEk, Inc.
In a suit claiming infringement of a patent for an ink-jet printing method, summary judgment of invalidity is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff did not produce evidence to create an issue of fact on whether defendant's prior patent inherently anticipated certain claims in plaintiff's patent; and 2) other claims were properly invalidated as obvious in light of the anticipation finding.

More...



Frequently Asked Questions

How do copyrights, patents, and trademarks differ?

What are the advantages of registering a copyright?

What is "work made for hire"?

When is copying something allowed under copyright law?

Who owns the patent on an invention created by a person as part of his or her job?

Is it necessary to hire a lawyer to submit a patent application?

What is a Provisional Patent Application?

When can the decor of a restaurant be protected under trade dress law?

How can a business prevent an employee from stealing trade secrets when the employee leaves the company?

What kinds of marks cannot be registered as federal trademarks?

Learn More: Intellectual Property Law

More...

**NEWS**
Legal Services
E-Newsletter - Business Organizations and Transactions - To Subscribe
News and Resources - Latest Intellectual Property News - Read More

 
Munck Carter, P.C.,
600 Banner Place Tower
12770 Coit Road
Dallas, Texas 75251

Marshall Office
110 South Bolivar, Suite 204
Marshall, Texas 75670

Home | Firm Overview | Practice Areas | Careers | Attorney Profiles | E-Newsletter
News and Resources | Contact Us | Resource Links
Munck Carter, P.C. 600 Banner Place Tower 12770 Coit Road Dallas, Texas 75251 Tel 972.628.3600
Marshall Office 110 South Bolivar, Suite 204 Marshall, Texas 75670 Tel 903.935.7900